<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Brutal Legend Review	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thekoalition.com/2009/brutal-legend-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thekoalition.com/2009/brutal-legend-review</link>
	<description>Gaming, Entertainment &#38; Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:12:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: NOthing		</title>
		<link>https://thekoalition.com/2009/brutal-legend-review#comment-12122</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NOthing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekoalition.com/?p=20179#comment-12122</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I find it odd you say the multiplayer feels tagged on, as it was the first thing they made. The whole rest of the game was built around it, basically, so your idea that it was just put in there so there would be multiplayer is completely off base. Methinks you just aren&#039;t fond of the RTS elements, which you call a &#039;flaw&#039; not because they&#039;re done poorly, but because they&#039;re there in the first place.  
 
All the reviewers seem to bring the RTS parts up as a flaw, but I really like it. Hack and slash is satisfying in the short term, but it gets old really quick. It&#039;s nice that in this game you can hack all you want, but there&#039;s variety in gameplay, so nothing wears thin in a hurry. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it odd you say the multiplayer feels tagged on, as it was the first thing they made. The whole rest of the game was built around it, basically, so your idea that it was just put in there so there would be multiplayer is completely off base. Methinks you just aren&#039;t fond of the RTS elements, which you call a &#039;flaw&#039; not because they&#039;re done poorly, but because they&#039;re there in the first place. </p>
<p>All the reviewers seem to bring the RTS parts up as a flaw, but I really like it. Hack and slash is satisfying in the short term, but it gets old really quick. It&#039;s nice that in this game you can hack all you want, but there&#039;s variety in gameplay, so nothing wears thin in a hurry. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: minxotic		</title>
		<link>https://thekoalition.com/2009/brutal-legend-review#comment-12097</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[minxotic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekoalition.com/?p=20179#comment-12097</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll be adding this one to my gamefly rental queue.  Thanks for your review. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ll be adding this one to my gamefly rental queue.  Thanks for your review. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Carl Daniel		</title>
		<link>https://thekoalition.com/2009/brutal-legend-review#comment-12090</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carl Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekoalition.com/?p=20179#comment-12090</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[the rts aspect completley put me off the game, i doubt i&#039;ll ever play it now ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the rts aspect completley put me off the game, i doubt i&#039;ll ever play it now </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
