<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: New Call of Duty Named &#038; Dated	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thekoalition.com/2010/new-call-of-duty-named-dated/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thekoalition.com/2010/new-call-of-duty-named-dated</link>
	<description>Gaming, Entertainment &#38; Tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:26:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: JOEKILLA		</title>
		<link>https://thekoalition.com/2010/new-call-of-duty-named-dated#comment-24449</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JOEKILLA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekoalition.com/?p=37425#comment-24449</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://thekoalition.com/2010/new-call-of-duty-named-dated#comment-24440&quot;&gt;James&lt;/a&gt;.

That&#039;s whats up, I was wondering why it disappeared. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://thekoalition.com/2010/new-call-of-duty-named-dated#comment-24440">James</a>.</p>
<p>That&#039;s whats up, I was wondering why it disappeared. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JOEKILLA		</title>
		<link>https://thekoalition.com/2010/new-call-of-duty-named-dated#comment-24448</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JOEKILLA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekoalition.com/?p=37425#comment-24448</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://thekoalition.com/2010/new-call-of-duty-named-dated#comment-24442&quot;&gt;Edward V&lt;/a&gt;.

I am speaking from the PS3 experience, WAW performed way better then COD4, very optimized and like I said went 1080P by default, lighting/textures way better then COD4. 
 
I am assuming this one will be COD4 in a Vietnam backdrop, people seem to love COD4 more then MW2, so expect massive sales for this. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://thekoalition.com/2010/new-call-of-duty-named-dated#comment-24442">Edward V</a>.</p>
<p>I am speaking from the PS3 experience, WAW performed way better then COD4, very optimized and like I said went 1080P by default, lighting/textures way better then COD4.</p>
<p>I am assuming this one will be COD4 in a Vietnam backdrop, people seem to love COD4 more then MW2, so expect massive sales for this. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Edward V		</title>
		<link>https://thekoalition.com/2010/new-call-of-duty-named-dated#comment-24442</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward V]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekoalition.com/?p=37425#comment-24442</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Treyarch made a good performing W@W due to Modern Warfare 1&#039;s increasing popularity, plus that game was Modern Warfare 1 but set in WWII.  
 
Treyarch wack. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Treyarch made a good performing W@W due to Modern Warfare 1&#039;s increasing popularity, plus that game was Modern Warfare 1 but set in WWII. </p>
<p>Treyarch wack. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James		</title>
		<link>https://thekoalition.com/2010/new-call-of-duty-named-dated#comment-24440</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekoalition.com/?p=37425#comment-24440</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://thekoalition.com/2010/new-call-of-duty-named-dated#comment-24439&quot;&gt;JOEKILLA&lt;/a&gt;.

edit comments is coming joe, just working out a few bugs with the plugin and the site ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://thekoalition.com/2010/new-call-of-duty-named-dated#comment-24439">JOEKILLA</a>.</p>
<p>edit comments is coming joe, just working out a few bugs with the plugin and the site </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JOEKILLA		</title>
		<link>https://thekoalition.com/2010/new-call-of-duty-named-dated#comment-24439</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JOEKILLA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thekoalition.com/?p=37425#comment-24439</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Treyarch mad a good performing COD with WAW, I remember playing that one after COD4 and saying oh shit this look better optimized, it even output at 1080P by default. 
 
I think that will only continue with this one, also the fact 
it is a fresh new realm in Vietnam will really set this game apart from any other COD we seen this generation. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Treyarch mad a good performing COD with WAW, I remember playing that one after COD4 and saying oh shit this look better optimized, it even output at 1080P by default.</p>
<p>I think that will only continue with this one, also the fact</p>
<p>it is a fresh new realm in Vietnam will really set this game apart from any other COD we seen this generation. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
