Comments on: ARMA 3 Preview Part 3: Vehicles https://thekoalition.com/2013/arma-3-preview-part-3-vehicles-2 Gaming, Entertainment & Tech Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:54:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2 By: Asad Quadri https://thekoalition.com/2013/arma-3-preview-part-3-vehicles-2#comment-151230 Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:54:00 +0000 http://thekoalition.com/?p=75393#comment-151230 In reply to DriverPadakaChessnuts.

Your guess is as good as mine. Most likely it’s all about marketing. What better way to show off the brand new PhysX 3.0 SDK than in a game like this? The SDK does have advantages like multi-thread support and Bohemia are including PhysX in multiplayer too, but I’ve seen Havok do everything that PhysX can and AMD users never miss out on what Havok offers. Hell even the Open Dynamics Engine is a very capable physics engine and that’s open-source.

]]> By: DriverPadakaChessnuts https://thekoalition.com/2013/arma-3-preview-part-3-vehicles-2#comment-151229 Mon, 01 Apr 2013 08:53:00 +0000 http://thekoalition.com/?p=75393#comment-151229 Isn’t PhysX still a very closed platform (it only runs on Nvidia cards without hacks, and even the it runs poor)? So why is Bohemia opting for that physics middleware when there are plenty others to choose from?

]]>