Yes, but no at the same time Tony. At the end of the day, some s**t must be talked!

See, man! This is what I’m talking about! You’re talking about how much you love the game! That’s what I want to see more of!

Correct, except for the lying part. I’m into everything 343, since it was constructed by Frank O’Connor & Kiki Wolfkill.

Hey Tone, critics can score Halo 5 as they wish, there’s no shooter better.

I’m playing on Heroic Difficulty, that AI is amazing. You get confident, thinking you’re all that, they’ll humble you; legitimately. Not by making the enemy a bullet sponge, but making then intelligent.

The stage I’m on now is massive with much exploration to be had. The game is great!

When I finish the Campaign Solo on Heroic & my daughter finishes; it’s Campaign Co-op time where I’ll get my Revenge!

To be fair, PS fans do this too. Remember when God of War: Ascension was getting bad scores and they complained without having played it. P.S. the bad scores for that game were justified. *barfs*

That game isn’t getting that kind of score. I guarantee that lol

Nope, haven’t played it. And nothing you said changes the fact that it isn’t its own game. You do realize, I’m in by no means touting PlayStation, or belittling MS, right? All I’m pointing out is how you have to take a good point, in this case, that Halo MCC is the best collection out there, and embellish that fact to the point where you’re saying things that aren’t true and it diminishes everything you say.

But since you brought up Sony shooters, no, Sony can’t touch MS on exclusive shooters in my opinion. MS has that covered and while at one time Sony tried to compete with KZ and Resistance, both decent franchises, (and tried MAG but that was a disaster) but objectively speaking they don’t come close to Halo. Sony has moved away from shooters, and in my opinion it is because A) That market is filled rather nicely by third parties and B) They know they can’t compete with Halo, COD, Battlefield, etc when it comes to that.

I brought Uncharted into this. I’m just pointing out the bs coverage applicable exclusively to M$ & Halo. The same scrutiny never applies to Sony.

You’ve never played Spartan Ops, have you? It has its own story, and larger than any shooter on the Playstation.

Gority,
Look at some of these reviews and Digital Foundry nitpicking. Tell me any game, that received this bs kind of treatment.

Lmao. I never said anything about Uncharted first off. I don’t buy collections for games I already played so I haven’t purchased any remaster or collection this gen. But since you brought it up, Uncharted never promised multiplayer in the collection, but MS didn’t deliver on what they promised with MCC hence the good faith gesture (which was a really smart move by them).

Spartan Ops was part of Halo 4, not its own game, so 5 as I said before. And the single player issues were posted everywhere… Halo MCC is hands down the best collection out there, regardless of its issues it had at launch, but you’re living in a fantasy world.

Stop reading ign & the other hater sites, please.

343 Industries did not make Halo MCC, it was farmed out. 343 Industries was making the best game to release this generation, Halo 5 Guardians.

In the absolutely flawless Halo Master Chief Collection:
Over 100 Multiplayer Maps
Halo:CE Anniversary
Halo 2: Anniversary
Halo 3
Halo 4
*Spartan Ops- Campaign, Campaign Co-op 2-4 Players, Story containing information needed going into Halo 5.
*Halo ODST- As a good faith gesture to the Multiplayer issues of Halo MCC. Free To Everyone for 10 Days initially, Free forever for those that played before December 31st.
**6 Games.

What good gesture did Sony offer for omitting Multiplayer in Uncharted Collection?

And, the single player in Halo MCC was completely void of problems. I’m not talking about the 8 Extremely Hardcore Sony Super PlayStation Fans making up problems when there we none. Those 8 Sony Fans knew they had a stripped Uncharted Collection on the way & decided to hate on all things M$.

343 Studios developed the (terrible) matchmaking service for MCC and the user interface so “didn’t make Halo MCC” is factually wrong. Sure they outsourced other parts though but your statement is not truthful.

“The single player of Halo MCC was perfect & much better and 6 games”

Also factually untrue. It contained 4 single player campaigns, Halo CE, Halo 2: Anniversary, Halo 3, and Halo 4. Halo 3: ODST was released 6-7 months later an given free to people who played MCC before December something. So if you even count that one, it’s five not six.

For saying the single player “was perfect”, also false. People were unable to save their games properly, had sound issues and problems unlocking achievements.

Complaining about review scores before playing the game themselves says something about a person.

I haven’t seen comments like this from anyone above the age of 12. This is a first.

BUT WHY?????!!!!

It’s still better than Halo 4, right?

Right?

DON’T YOU REALIZE AN 85 IS A COMPLETE FAILURE???

—Nahh Tony. 50/100 is an F.
A 50/100 AAA game isn’t worthy of a purchase nor rental.—

So you didn’t “purchase nor rent” Ryse?

The games like and 85 chill the fuck out Zinc! It’s still a good game with a promising MP.

No. On a 1 to 10 scale, 5 is literally in the middle, in other words AVERAGE. We’re not talking about schools here.

No one would not want to play as The Master Chief, including me. Yet, there’s a story to the Halo Universe that makes sense.

One day there’ll be a game devoted Specifically to “The Blue Team”; Master Chiefs Team.

People always claim games have no story or soul, now, we have one of the great 3 sci fi stories (Star Wars, Mass Effect & Halo). So, you suggest they not tell it & give us a meaningless shooter.

As much as I call my son The Master Chief, I don’t even want that. Let 343 Industries tell the story of the Halo Universe, as it’s described in the books as closely as they can.

For the record, I’m Rollin With The Chief & his Blue Team.

I’m a casual player and literally all I want to do is play as Master Chief. He’s the coolest character why wouldn’t I want to play as him the most?

Introducing new characters is fine but again making the player use that character for 70% percent of the campaign instead of the main icon for the game is simply disappointing on so many levels. You’ll understand this further once you play the game. Complete the campaign then we can talk about whether or not I’m right or wrong on my point lol

Nahh Tony. 50/100 is an F.
A 50/100 AAA game isn’t worthy of a purchase nor rental.

80/100 is a “C” in Parochial Schools = average.

In most Universities 80/100 is average & you may not get in.

AAA games 80/100 is average. 50/100 for a AAA game is Free months later.

You have the greatest business acumen but don’t know basic math. An average score would be a 5/10. 8/10 is way above average.