I still can’t afford it.

Dude, PS Now will eventually have PS1, PS2, PS3, AND PS4 games. Sony has said this multiple times.

Tony, $180 per year for PS Now
$50 per year for PS+
=
$230.00 annually.

Also, PS Now will only have PS3 games, period!

And 4 New games for $60 each would be 4 brand new Next generation games! Not old has been games with lag…please.

You and I rarely ageee on much but we are in 100% agreement on this one. This is the only way that PS Now makes sense.

How did I contradict myself?

Also, why would it be $230 annually? $15 a month for a year would be $180. That’s what a person pays for just one MMO. If you consider that you’d get PS1, PS2, PS3 AND PS4 games, that price is a virtual steal.

Shit, even if you go with your inflated price of $230 a year that’d still be a steal. $230 is less than the price of four $60 dollar games ($240) and people buy way more than that a year. In what universe isn’t $230 for countless games worth it? Either way you slice it, PS Now will be very much worth it in the future.

I played Enslaved when the service was in “beta”. (It’s not really beta if you have to pay for it.) Some people are saying the lag has improved since then. Maybe I’ll try it again to see if it’s better.

Wow, that lag is worse than I thought.

With any lag on a service like this, makes that price all the more absurd.

I did read it Tony, you contradict yourself. Yeah, I read it.

In the future, even if Sony released all PS1, PS2, & PS3 games it wouldn’t be worth $230 annually.

Sony = lies and overhype that underdelivers. The laggy PS Now is just the next thing on the list. This service will never be worth it with that price.

That’s definite proof that Sony’s TV line is going to end soon enough. That loss making business is going down the drain.

Gosh this is all hilarious lmfaooo

http://thekoalition.com/2014/12/samsung-smart-tvs-get-playstation-now-2015/

If its coming to Samsung TVs it will definitely expand to other devices in the future.

Don’t forget that PS Now is also coming to other devices including Samsung TVs in the future. I completely agree with your editorial. If in the future Sony adds more classics I will definitely check it out as this service has potential but the question is whether Sony will do something with services like this and PS Vue.

He did read the title but saw that it was something positive about PlayStation and therefore came to the conclusion that it can’t ever be true.

Is the price worth it if you don’t own a console but have PS Now built into your TV? Definitely! (assuming it works as smoothly as advertised)

“there aren’t close to 100 good games to play in the PS3 library”

Not that you had any credibility to begin with …

http://thekoalition.com/videos/co-op-podcast-102-microsoft/
“SONY can’t afford to buy a single sheet of paper!”
– otherZinc
http://thekoalition.com/videos…

You say the dumbest s***. But please, continue.

It’s the potential of it that I’m talking about. So far, PlayStation Now IS delivering. With more games on more devices this will be a great service. All the pieces on in place, Sony just needs to capitalize on it.

He didn’t have to read the editorial to figure that out, all he had to read was the title smh lmao

You didn’t read the editorial, did you? I explain how NOW it isn’t worth it but in the FUTURE it will be.

Only you can think $180 annually, is a good price to play old, laggy, PS3 games, & Indie Games. Couple that with a $50 annual PSN subscription. $230 Per Year…ahh, no.

This will go nowhere fast. Also, there aren’t close to 100 good games to play in the PS3 library.

Consumers would be suckers for buying into this.