I didn’t even notice it WAS the Pinocchio song until Manny told me lol

I’m not sure where to post questions for the show, i have one question:

Do you think gamers forgot about Deep Down now that they’ve seen footage of Bloodborne? Both games are pretty much the same Dark Souls-esque gameplay and they’re exclusives to PS4.

No clue why NFS MW is on that list but ok.

Nevertheless, just because others have slipped up at some point doesn’t mean everyone eventually will. Considering this is the last Uncharted, I’m even less concerned.

Simply because you have a good doesn’t make immune from releasing “bad” games. DICE, Bioware, Sony Santa Monica, Capcom, Zipper Interactive and Criterion Games all had a great track record until that one game that tarnished it (BF 3, DA 2, GoW:A, RE 5, SOCOM 4, NFS:MW).

I’m not saying all those are bad, they just weren’t up to the quality of what we’ve seen from those studios.

With Naughty Dog’s track record, that’s your stance? It seems like you’ll pretty much remain skeptical into the foreseeable future until they finally slip up and you’ll claim you were “right the whole time”. Also, I never forgot any of these guys are businesses.

I’m not saying there should be a concern I’m saying I am concerned.
A growing trend I’ve been seeing the AAA market is that games quality is inversely proportional to its hype, meaning the hype a game gets the higher the chance it’ll be mediocre. Watch Dogs, Titanfall, Destiny anyone

We’ve seen publishers riding the name sake of a franchise to squeeze as much money from us as possible, RE6 & SFIV anyone

Looking the type and quality of DLC from U2, U3 and TLoU we see that the DLC increased and got increasingly shadier. Not only do we have DLC animations but DLC single player difficulty mode.

I can’t imagine what U4 is going to be like. Plus remember, Sony is a business.

When I said that, I meant essentially stop catering to idiots by removing cg because they assume it’s gameplay.

I’m not pandering to anyone and I’m not making assumptions. I just see these sort of trailers as unnecessary and misleading.

It’s not hurting anything and it’s helping to promote a game. Anyone who makes assumptions beyond that….well that’s on them, not the dev. Stop pandering to idiots.

I’m never getting over it. CGI trailers had their purpose and place before but that’s no longer the case. They aren’t necessary with the graphical power of most games these days. Blow people away with the actual game graphics and not a promise of something it can never be.

And that’s not me saying that the 99 cent animation is a good thing. But it’s one hell of a reach to instantly think there should be concern for the next game in a series that’s arguably improved with every release.

What?

Let’s assume Brian’s concerns aren’t simply him being negative about a game he won’t have on PC. A gameplay trailer and 99 cent animation in Last of Us multi-player is now a cause for concern? For a person I typically respect for his logical stance, that makes zero sense.

Watch_Dogs is an example of a game that showed what they intended and they couldn’t reach that mark.

And get over it Tony. There’s NOTHING wrong with CG trailers or In-Engine cinematic trailers foh.

But haven’t games released “in-engine” trailers that early gameplay didn’t match but they worked toward that goal? Didn’t the first Uncharted do this?

Also, “Buy a PC” as instruction to counter the exclusive stuff is asinine. There are games that also don’t come to PC

My man! Enjoy!

Lol I saw

Just seeing this now bro. My bad.

I showed it on the show lol