Comments on: Battlefield: Bad Company 2 Review

By: Albert

Albert — Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:45:18 +0000

@ JOEKILLA – "BC2 clearly has its own look but is nothing close to MW2."

I would have to disagree here. On the PC, BC2's visual's completely trumps over MW2 in everything except for frame rate. MW2 runs on a modified version of the engine used for COD4, which is aging in comparison to the Frostbite engine, which can render many more objects (and your epic destructibility). MW2 has smoother frame rates on older rigs (not sure about the story on consoles).

Just my 2 cents

By: richardbailey

richardbailey — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:22:31 +0000

Thanks for the criticism Joe. After a while these games start to look similar only because of some of the similarities to the places you travel to. Still you raise a good point because these are two different games and thus will have some differences.

By: JOEKILLA

JOEKILLA — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:06:58 +0000

Wait just caught it, you really think it looks like MW2? seriously son?, you played it from 200 feet awayor something?, everything else is legit in the review but the visuals comment"Graphically the game looks and feels a lot like Modern Warfare 2 in many ways"^that ain't true at all, both games have their own look and look nothing like each other, MW2 looks waybetter and more detailed but BC2 clearly has its own look but is nothing close to MW2.

By: JOEKILLA

JOEKILLA — Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:02:39 +0000

Why you didn't mention the graphics at all???, then gave it an 8?????that 10 for sound is perfect btw, probably the way all shooters should be sounding these days