Comments on: Generation of Chaos: Pandora’s Reflection Review – Simplistic Strategy https://thekoalition.com/reviews/generation-of-chaos-pandoras-reflection-review-simplistic-strategy Gaming, Entertainment & Tech Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:45:39 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: David Jagneaux https://thekoalition.com/reviews/generation-of-chaos-pandoras-reflection-review-simplistic-strategy#comment-151153 Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:40:00 +0000 http://thekoalition.com/?p=73054#comment-151153 In reply to allenphelix.

Hey Allen, thanks for the comment!

1) I never said the dialogue was bad, in fact I said it was actually very well written and well translated. I said it was dense, which means there is A LOT of it. So much so, that, you actually spend more time between battles reading dialogue than you do actually playing the game. This would not be as terrible if, as I stated in the review, the actual gameplay was not so casually focused and simplistic.
2) I’m glad you like the game and think it deserves a higher score, but a 60% is not a bad score on our scale. In fact, it means the game is above average.
3) I did note the cheap price tag and did take that into consideration in my review.
Thanks again for the comment!

]]> By: allenphelix https://thekoalition.com/reviews/generation-of-chaos-pandoras-reflection-review-simplistic-strategy#comment-151151 Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:40:00 +0000 http://thekoalition.com/?p=73054#comment-151151 What do you actually deem to be dense dialogue? What we as American’s think is bad dialogue may be considered reasonable in Japan. I think Japanese developers tend to not get a fair shake this generation, everybody wants to cast hate upon their ability to craft enjoyable gaming experiences. I think this game deserves at least an 83% seeing as it is cheap and offers a truly unique experience given the price tag. When a game is cheaper reviewers should really take scores into consideration because it’s easier to have a valuable experience with a cheaper price tag.

]]>