Recently for school, I wrote an essay on how the first superheroes in comics have affected pop culture throughout the past seven (almost 8 now) decades. For this essay, I had to research the golden and silver age of comics. Interestingly enough, some of the things I learned have now inspired me to write an article on my favorite superhero of all time, Superman himselfย and whether or not he is too overpowered of a superhero in todayโs industry.
In 1938 and 1939, the characters of Superman and Batman were created. I mention just these two for now for a few reasons. It was from those two characters and so many more that defined the golden age of comics. Really, it all started with Action Comics #1 bringing a superhero, Superman, into the world of comic books and kicking off the golden age. However, it obviously wouldnโt have kept up if not for the other slew of heroes being thrown into the mix such as Batman, Wonder Woman, Captain America, etc. The reason I only mention Batman along with Superman for this specific article, though, is because if you fast forward 76 years from 1938, youโll arrive at today.
Now, if youโve been on the internet in the past, well, ever, then youโve probably seen the never ending debate on โWho would win in a fight, Batman or Superman?โ Whatโs interesting (and obvious) about that debate is that most of the time, it comes down to peopleโs personal opinion, and to me it seems that the majority of the time, Batman wins even though heโs a human and Superman is a Kryptonian with god-like super powers. So looking at that debate all the time and seeing how many people side with the caped crusader for the big win, I started to ask myself, โWell, why?โ What happened to Superman since 1938 that, while standing tall as a pillar in pop culture, heโs so often put down below other heroes that defined the golden age of comics over seven decades ago? Has the man of steel become too overpowered and therefore boring to ever be DCโs most selling character again? I love Superman, heโs my favorite superhero, so my answer to that question is โNo.โ However, I must remain as unbiased as possible and look at some clear evidence to figure out the true answer.
Comics
Before I dive into this though, Iโd like to first say that everything I am about to say is simply what I have personally gathered, and others may have differing opinions. Although, this is the internet so I suppose thatโs bound to happen anyway. Oh well, letโs just dive in.
Itโs no secret that after the New 52 reboot of DC Comics, the Superman title wasnโt doing so hot especially compared to Scott Snyderโs impressive sales on the Batman title. The creative team for the main Superman series has changed hands several times already in only thirty-eight issues. Also, if we take a look at many of the other things to come out of the New 52 with Superman, itโs quite easy to find things that are less than interesting (to put it delicately).
Now like I said before, I am a huge fan of the man of steel. I’ve read close to everything that has his name in the title the past three years since the reboot, and there is in fact a good chunk of it that is worth the read brought to us by some great writers (thank God for Geoff Johns and Scott Snyder, am I right?) However, while there have been someโฆ poor writers (cough Lobdell cough) on Superman the past few years, there have been some exceptional writers that still couldnโt quite grasp a good story with the man of tomorrow.
This brings me back to the original question of the day: โWell, why?โ Why is it that we so often have to bring on superstar writers just to be able to have a good Superman story? In my personal opinion, it seems that the man of steel is simply difficult to write because of the kind of character he is. I personally feel that the character has far more depth to him than people realize, but unfortunately, that doesnโt seem to make him easier to write. Iโm not saying thatโs a bad thing necessarily, but it is something to look at nonetheless. Is that the same with other properties, though? Letโs find out, by taking a quick look at movies and video games!
Movies
Say what you will about Superman Returns, but it was better than whatever the heck The Quest for Peace was. I can hardly even picture what happened in Superman III, itโs been so long since I watched it. Letโs be honest, there have been some crappy Superman films, but there have also been some great ones. So letโs take a look at them!
The first Superman film, released in 1978, is one of the most important superhero films ever to be released. Fans absolutely loved it. Superman IVโฆ well, not so much. Superman II was good. Superman III was surelyโฆ something. Superman Returns was a bust if Iโve ever seen one. The Man of Steel film is what I would like to focus on here, though. It seems to be in some sort of middle area with fans. Some people hate it and others love it. This brings me right around back to my original question yet again, however. โWell, why?โ
Man of Steel was in no way a flop by any means. It made a good profit, it had some relatively good reviews, it is the very start of DCโs massive cinematic universe, and yetโฆ It wasnโt perfect. First of all, Superman killed the villain which was pretty weird, but thatโs not the point. The point Iโm going to make is the same point everybody else makes. Superman destroyed a pretty sizable area of Smallville during his battle there, and worse, he and Faora destroyed the IHOP! Now where is Pa Kent going to get his morning pancakes? Ohโฆ right.
Anyway, yes Zod and the man of steel did mess up a good bit of Smallville and Metropolis (I still argue that the Metropolis part was really mostly Zod, but hey whatever). Now, the thing about that is the battle between Zod and Superman was really freakinโ cool, you canโt deny that, but it did seem like there was some sort of price to creating a fight on such a scale. So the question is: Is Superman such a powerful character that youโve simply gotta mess up a bunch of crap to capture how mighty he is? Does that make the characterโฆ overpowered? I donโt know, letโs look at video games!
Video Games
Iโm just going to cut to the chase here. Superman video games absolutely blow. All of them. They just donโt work. Superman doesnโt work in video games. He just doesnโt. And that brings me back to my original question yet again. โWell, why?โ
The answer to this question this time around is pretty simple actually. While Superman has an abundance of villains that give the boy scout a run for his money, in essence he canโt really be hurt. In video games, you need constant flows of bad guys, something for the player to fight and get better at. Just look at the Batman Arkham games. Batman has random thugs and bad guys thrown at him throughout the course of the game that can hurt him and get progressively tougher.
That canโt happen with Superman. To have a good video game like that, the character needs to be able to die and the player needs to have some sort of challenge. Even if you were to try and go in a different direction with it, youโd just end up with Superman for Nintendo 64. So in the end, the answer to that question, at least on the video game side of things, is โbecause Superman is too powerful for video games.โ
In Conclusion
Superman is awesome. I love the character with all of my everything. There are many films and comics with Superman as the central character that are, in fact, worth the watch or read. The question is though, โIs the character too overpowered, at least some of the time?โ It breaks my heart, but the answer is yes, sometimes heโs just too powerful to make certain things work that does work with some other characters. Thereโs obviously some clear evidence towards that. Does this make him a bad character? In my opinion, no it doesnโt. In my eyes there is a far greater depth to Superman than some people seem to realize that makes him a character anyone can look up to.
Whatโs your opinion, though? Do you think that Superman is too overpowered to be interesting? Do you kind of want to see a good Superman video game even though it probably wonโt ever happen? Do you even like Superman to begin with? Let me know in the comments below! Also, thank you so much for reading. Make sure to check out my comic podcast Baby and The Beard (new episodes every Saturday) right here on The Koalition! Iโd make some sort of DC or Superman pun to wrap this up, but I could literally give you 52 reasons why thatโd be silly.
Discover more from The Koalition
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



